Rigor: What do we really mean? And why inquiry sits at the heart of it

Recently, I facilitated a parent session at Jakarta Intercultural School focused on a word we use often… but don’t always stop to define:

Rigor.

As I listened to parents share their thinking, I was reminded how powerful and persistent our assumptions about learning can be.

Rigor can be described as:

  • more work

  • harder work

  • more worksheets

  • getting the right answers

  • doing things quickly

  • longer numbers

But here’s the tension:

What we often see as rigorous is not always what is rigorous.

The Problem with What We Can See

In classrooms, rigor is often associated with what is visible:

  • completed tasks

  • full pages

  • correct answers

  • neat presentation

But these are indicators of completion, not necessarily thinking.

Because rigor is not about how much students produce.

Rigor is about the depth, complexity, and quality of thinking students engage in.

And that kind of thinking isn’t always immediately visible.

Rigor Lives in the Thinking

When we shift our lens, rigor becomes much clearer.

Rigor is not:

  • recall

  • more work

  • harder numbers

  • faster answers

  • longer tasks

Rigor is:

  • Deep thinking – going beyond surface-level responses

  • Conceptual understanding – seeing relationships and big ideas

  • Transfer – applying learning in new and unfamiliar contexts

  • Reasoning – explaining not just what, but why

  • Flexibility – approaching ideas from multiple angles

  • Critical thinking – analysing, questioning, and evaluating ideas

  • Considering perspectives – recognising there isn’t always one answer

  • Metacognition – reflecting on and adjusting thinking

As explored in the session, rigor is grounded in thinking such as analysing, questioning, justifying, and explaining, not simply recalling information.

Students go from recalling facts about a rainforest:

Layers of the rainforest

The living things in a rainforest

Temperature of the rainforest

To deep understanding where they make connections between all of those ideas and exampling the role of interdependence in a rainforest. This shift requires deep thinking and rigor, using factual knowledge to build deeper understanding.

TheWorld Economic Forum Future of Jobs Report (2025) highlights that some of the fastest-growing skills include creative thinking, analytical thinking, resilience, flexibility, curiosity, and lifelong learning; capabilities closely connected to rigor.

Inquiry and Rigor Are Interconnected

One of the most important shifts we need to make is this:

Inquiry and rigor are not separate.

Inquiry is not an “add-on.”
It is not something we do after the “real learning.”

Inquiry is what creates the conditions for rigor.

When students are:

  • exploring and wondering

  • asking questions

  • investigating ideas

  • analysing information

  • testing and revising thinking

  • justifying and defending their thinking

  • considering different perspectives

They are engaging in rigorous learning. This is not incidental. It is intentional.

As Kath Murdoch (2015, p.15) explains,

Inquiry learning is an approach that demands high-order thinking. The student is continually challenged by the teacher, and tasks are designed to prompt students to question, predict, gather, analyze, synthesize, and reflect.
— Kath Murdoch (2015, p.15)

Inquiry invites complexity.

It asks students to sit with uncertainty, to navigate multiple possibilities, and to make sense of ideas, not just reproduce them.

And that is cognitively demanding work.

What This Means for Us as Teachers

If we redefine rigor in this way, it shifts our role.

We begin to design learning that asks:

  • Where is the thinking in this experience?

  • Are students analysing or simply following steps?

  • Do students have opportunities to question, challenge, and consider perspectives?

  • Are they making meaning, or just completing tasks?

  • Are they justifying and reasoning in connection to their learning?

It also shifts what we notice.

We start to look beyond:

  • correct answers

and begin to value:

  • how students are thinking

  • the strategies they choose

  • the questions they ask

  • the connections they make

  • how their thinking changes over time

Because these are the indicators of rigor.

When Rigor Doesn’t Look Like Rigor

Rigorous learning doesn’t need to look like:

  • quiet classrooms

  • students working independently

  • fast completion

It can look like:

  • discussion

  • disagreement

  • uncertainty

  • revision

  • multiple perspectives

Sometimes it looks messy.

But that mess is not a lack of rigor.

It is evidence of it.

A Final Reflection

If learning is about completion,
then a worksheet works.

But if learning is about:

  • understanding

  • independence

  • critical thinking

  • navigating complexity

  • and preparing learners for an ever-changing world

then we need something more.

We need learning that invites students to:
question, analyse, interpret, and make meaning.

We need inquiry.

And we need to remember:

References:

‍ ‍


Next
Next

When Students Understand the Language of Learning: Moving Towards Assessment-Capable Learners